|The Physical Object|
Imperial preference, historically, a commercial arrangement in which preferential rates (i.e., rates below the general level of an established tariff) were granted to one another by constituent units of an empire. Imperial preference could also include other sorts of preference, such as favourable consideration in the allocation of public contracts, indirect subsidies to shipping, and. The use of preferential trade methods does not necessarily express malice or indifference to the economic welfare of others. There are instances, such as the German economic program in the Danubian area before the war, and possibly the present program of the U.S.S.R. in the same area, that represent primarily a wish to secure domination and have little fairness or economic Cited by: 2. The development of intra-imperial trade by means of imperial preferences was a favourite theme with the imperial federationists of the period from to ; but the loyalty of the Mother Country to the ideal of free trade placed an insuperable obstacle in the way of this project. Throughout history empires facilitated trade within their territories by building and securing trade and migration routes, and by imposing common norms, languages, religions, and legal systems, all of which led to the accumulation of imperial capital. In this paper, we collect novel data on the rise and fall of empires over the last years, construct a measure of accumulated imperial.
Since the failure of the Colonial Conference to adopt any arrangement as regards preferential trade, some of the strongest Imperialists in Canada have urged the refusal of any Canadian contribution to Imperial defence (Canada alone of the Colonies has done nothing) until the British people put their food supply on a secure basis. American colonies, also called thirteen colonies or colonial America, the 13 British colonies that were established during the 17th and early 18th centuries in what is now a part of the eastern United colonies grew both geographically along the Atlantic coast and westward and numerically to 13 from the time of their founding to the American Revolution (–81). This book explores how efforts to promote a ‘British World’ system, centred on promoting trade between Britain and the Dominions, grew and declined in influence between the s and s. The book’s principal contribution is to demonstrate the signiﬁcance of preferential trade with their colonial territories; Japan and Germany sought ex-panded empires of their own,ﬁrst through trade, later through conquest. The growth of imperial blocs coincided with rising and sometimes prohibitive bar-riers against foreign goods.
Only a few studies have emphasised the importance of a colonial history on patterns of trade. For historical epochs ranging from to , Estevadeordal, Frantz and Taylor () and Mitchener and Weidenmier () assess the role of empires in explaining trade patterns. Using inter-war and post-war data (– and –, respectively), Eichengreen and Irwin () . Unlike the Berlin Conference, which initiated the formalised scramble for Africa by military conquests, post-colonial contending powers are employing soft power -- which dangles economic and. This is a major new book which explores the ideology of key imperial campaigns, and their popular support. It makes a critical contribution to recent debates -- about the importance of empire to the nature and development of British national identities before and after the First World War. Imperial federation was seen as a means of strengthening the Empire. At the Colonial Conference, Seddon proposed that Britain and New Zealand establish a system of preferential tariffs and the conference endorsed the principle of preferential trade within the Empire. Britain had to stand aside because of its continued commitment to free trade.